Rakesh Kishore’s name has been making headlines across India in October 2025. A senior advocate by profession, he has spent years working in the legal field, but his career took a dramatic turn when he was suspended by the Bar Council of India after an incident inside the Supreme Court. On October 6, 2025, Kishore attempted to hurl his shoe at Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai during a court proceeding. The act shocked the legal community and the public alike, sparking debates about professional conduct, judicial accountability, and the limits of protest inside the courtroom.
Born on September 10, 1954, in Mayur Vihar, Delhi, Kishore is now 72 years old. His life story is not just about this one controversial act. It is also about his long journey through education, his late entry into the legal profession, his involvement in housing society disputes, and his role as a community leader. While he was not widely known in the legal fraternity before this incident, his actions have suddenly placed him at the center of national attention.
Early Life and Background
Rakesh was born on September 10, 1954, in Mayur Vihar, Phase 1, Delhi. Growing up in a middle-class family in the capital city, he experienced the social and cultural changes of post-independence India. Delhi in the 1950s and 1960s was a city in transition, and Kishore’s upbringing reflected both traditional values and the aspirations of a modernizing society. His family’s roots in Mayur Vihar gave him a strong sense of belonging to the community, something that would later influence his involvement in local housing society matters.
Unlike many lawyers who begin their careers early, Kishore’s path was different. He pursued higher education in science and law before eventually entering the legal profession at the age of 55. This late start is unusual in the legal field, where most advocates begin practicing in their 20s or 30s. His decision to join the Bar Council of Delhi in 2009 suggests that he may have had a different career before turning to law, though details about his earlier professional life remain limited in public records.
Family and Childhood
Details about Rakesh Kishore’s family are limited, but it is known that he comes from a Hindu family in Delhi. His father, according to some reports, worked in education administration, which may have influenced Kishore’s respect for learning and his pursuit of multiple degrees. Growing up in Mayur Vihar, he was surrounded by a close-knit community where family ties and neighborhood relations played an important role.
Kishore’s childhood in Delhi would have been shaped by the city’s rapid growth in the decades after independence. The 1960s and 1970s saw Delhi expand as a hub of politics, education, and culture. For a young boy growing up in this environment, the exposure to debates about law, governance, and society may have planted the seeds of his later interest in advocacy.
Rakesh Kishore – Quick Facts
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Rakesh Kishore |
| Profession | Advocate (Senior Lawyer) |
| Date of Birth | 10 September 1954 (Friday) |
| Age (as of 2025) | 72 Years |
| Birthplace | Mayur Vihar, Phase 1, Delhi, India |
| Hometown | Mayur Vihar, Delhi, India |
| Zodiac Sign | Virgo |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Religion | Hinduism |
| Educational Qualifications | • M.Sc. • L.L.B. • Ph.D. |
| Marital Status | Married |
| Known For | Throwing a shoe at Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai in October 2025 |
| Controversy | Suspended by the Bar Council of India (October 2025) |
| Bar Enrollments | • Bar Council of Delhi (2009) • Supreme Court Bar Association • Shahdara Bar Association |
| Leadership Role | Former President, Riverview Apartments, Mayur Vihar Phase 1 |
| Notable Petitions | • 2021 petition before Delhi Cooperative Tribunal (garbage tubes issue) • 2022 writ petition in Delhi High Court (fire safety certificate issue) |
| Police Record | No prior criminal record; briefly detained in October 2025 after shoe-throwing incident |
| Current Status (2025) | Suspended advocate; facing disciplinary action by Bar Council of India |
Education and Academic Achievements
Kishore’s academic journey is impressive. He holds an M.Sc., an L.L.B., and a Ph.D. These qualifications show a man who values education and intellectual achievement. His science degree (M.Sc.) suggests that he had an interest in research and analysis, while his law degree (L.L.B.) gave him the foundation to practice as an advocate. His Ph.D. indicates a commitment to advanced study, though details about his doctoral research are not widely available.
Even though Kishore entered the legal profession late, his academic achievements gave him credibility. His qualifications allowed him to join the Bar Council of Delhi in 2009 and later become a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association. His education also gave him the confidence to challenge authorities, whether in his housing society or in the highest court of the land.
Professional Journey as an Advocate
Rakesh Kishore’s entry into the legal profession came relatively late. At the age of 55, in 2009, he enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi. This was unusual, as most advocates begin their careers decades earlier. Yet, Kishore’s late start did not stop him from becoming active in the legal community. He quickly became a registered member of the Supreme Court Bar Association, the Shahdara Bar Association, and the Bar Council of Delhi.
His professional journey was marked by persistence. Despite not being a high-profile lawyer handling landmark cases, Kishore carved out a space for himself in the legal fraternity. He was known for his willingness to file petitions and raise issues that others might have ignored. His work often reflected his concern for community matters, such as housing society disputes and safety regulations.
Career Highlights and Contributions
While Kishore may not have argued high-profile constitutional cases, his contributions were significant in their own way. His petitions before the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal and the Delhi High Court reflected his determination to address issues of governance and safety in housing societies. These cases may seem small compared to national legal battles, but they mattered deeply to the residents affected by them.
One of his notable efforts was his petition in 2021 regarding the use of garbage tubes in Riverview Apartments, where he served as president. He argued that the society’s former president and secretary had failed to comply with an earlier tribunal order. Although the petition was dismissed in 2022, it showed his persistence in pursuing accountability.
Another important contribution was his writ petition in the Delhi High Court in 2022, where he raised concerns about fire safety in a multi-storey complex. He claimed that the building had no fire safety certificate for nearly two decades.
Leadership Roles in Housing Society
Beyond the courtroom, Kishore was deeply involved in his local community. As president of Riverview Apartments in Mayur Vihar Phase 1, he took on leadership responsibilities that extended beyond legal matters. Housing societies in Delhi often face challenges related to maintenance, safety, and governance, and Kishore positioned himself as someone willing to take these issues head-on.
His leadership, however, was not without controversy. While some residents appreciated his activism, others accused him of being confrontational. Reports suggest that several complaints were filed against him by residents, including one about an alleged assault on a senior citizen in November 2021. These incidents painted a mixed picture of his leadership—on one hand, a man committed to improving conditions in his society, and on the other, someone whose methods sometimes created conflict.
See Also:- Sherriy Singh Height, Age, Husband, Children, Family, Biography
Legal Petitions and Court Cases
Kishore’s legal activism is best understood through the petitions he filed. In August 2021, he approached the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal regarding the use of garbage tubes in Riverview Apartments. He argued that the society’s leadership had failed to comply with an earlier order. However, in June 2022, the Tribunal dismissed the petition, stating that it was no longer valid.
Undeterred, Kishore filed another writ petition in the Delhi High Court. This time, he raised concerns about mismanagement in a multi-storey complex, particularly the lack of a fire safety certificate from 2004 to 2021. He asked the court to direct the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to take action. While the case did not result in major reforms, it highlighted the risks faced by residents living in buildings without proper safety clearances.
Controversies and Public Image
Kishore’s career has not been free from controversy. Even before the October 2025 incident that brought him into the national spotlight, he had faced criticism from his own community. As president of Riverview Apartments in Mayur Vihar Phase 1, Kishore was often at the center of disputes. Residents accused him of being aggressive in his leadership style, and some even filed complaints against him. One of the most serious allegations came in November 2021, when he was accused of assaulting a senior citizen. While no major legal action followed, the complaint added to his reputation as a confrontational figure.
These controversies painted a mixed picture of Kishore. On one hand, he was seen as a man who cared deeply about accountability and governance, willing to take issues to court when others stayed silent. On the other hand, his methods often drew criticism for being too combative. This dual image—of a committed advocate and a controversial leader—set the stage for the dramatic events of October 2025.
The October 2025 Shoe-Throwing Incident
On October 6, 2025, Rakesh Kishore shocked the nation when he hurled his shoe at Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai inside the Supreme Court. The incident occurred during a court proceeding, and it immediately drew widespread media attention. Such an act of defiance inside the highest court of the land was unprecedented and raised serious questions about professional conduct and respect for judicial institutions.
Eyewitnesses reported that Kishore appeared visibly agitated before the incident. When he threw the shoe, security personnel quickly intervened, and the courtroom was thrown into chaos. The Chief Justice was unharmed, but the symbolic nature of the act was powerful. In India, throwing a shoe has long been considered a gesture of extreme disrespect, and Kishore’s action was interpreted as a direct challenge to the authority of the judiciary.
Reasons Behind the Outburst
In the aftermath of the incident, Kishore explained his actions to the media. He said that he was angered by comments made by the Chief Justice regarding the restoration of a beheaded Lord Vishnu idol at the Javari temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh. Kishore claimed that he felt deeply offended by the remarks, which he believed disrespected his faith.
He also pointed to a speech delivered by the Chief Justice in Mauritius, where the CJI stated that India’s legal system is based on the rule of law, not the rule of a bulldozer. Kishore said that these comments further fueled his anger, as he felt they undermined the values he held dear. In his own words, he described his protest as being driven by a “divine force,” suggesting that he saw his actions as a moral duty rather than a professional misstep.
Suspension by the Bar Council of India (BCI)
The Bar Council of India (BCI) responded swiftly to the incident. Within days, Kishore was suspended from practicing law. The BCI issued a show-cause notice, asking him to explain why the suspension should not be made permanent. The notice also made it clear that disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against him.
The suspension meant that Kishore was barred from appearing, pleading, or practicing in any court, tribunal, or authority in India. This was a severe blow to his career, as it effectively ended his ability to work as an advocate. The BCI’s decision was widely reported in the media, and it was seen as a strong message that such behavior would not be tolerated within the legal profession.
Police Action and Legal Consequences
Following the shoe-throwing incident, Kishore was taken into custody by the Delhi Police. He was questioned for three hours, but the police later released him. According to official statements, Kishore had no prior criminal record, and the Supreme Court’s registrar general did not wish to press charges. As a result, no formal case was registered against him.
This decision sparked further debate. Some argued that Kishore had been let off lightly, while others felt that the decision not to press charges was appropriate given the circumstances. The fact that he was released without charges allowed him to continue speaking to the media, where he reiterated his lack of remorse and his belief that his actions were justified.
Read Also:- Aadhirai Soundarajan Height, Age, Boyfriend, Family, Biography
